From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 12:52:18 PDT
To: wessorh@ar.com
Subject: Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?
In-Reply-To: <199408280534.WAA01508@ar.com>
Message-ID: <9408281948.AA00880@ininx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com> writes

> why don't you just buy an RSA toolkit licence and patch it inro whatever
> you want, just don't redestribute code...

The obstacle there has been that this is for a person who refuses on
principle to affirm that he is a national person of any nation.  I think
that such a person could not obtain an RSA toolkit license.  Right?

The interest in the ViaCrypt option arose on the hope that their
national requirements (merely being ``in the US'') might be satisfied,
even if those for MIT's PGP 2.6 (affirmation that one is a US citizen or
national) could not be.

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	jkreznar@ininx.com	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLmDpF8Dhz44ugybJAQEtJQP/VsvgQ2AjvwLB6IDETveF49Ll2MPjtqQq
33/eWlWcqLxYKwDE3GAM/2ug4yAQtLlRg6IciNnzj7nS/4dZgeHxEB+bmMt3kTra
JvTKLiJcEWAS1Y50mE5Dqnv6eTLlEy9TUcViTPkOWtWhZHcKi/GyuwPxvW4ZU17d
3aAHXaFi39M=
=MU/N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----