1994-08-11 - Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?

Header Data

From: Patrick Juola <juola@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 92a5d593f68ce45b01ef4f38cdea7457ca8f037d2c69fe8a09695c6f6bcfd416
Message ID: <199408111645.KAA07094@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-11 16:46:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 09:46:15 PDT

Raw message

From: Patrick Juola <juola@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 09:46:15 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
Message-ID: <199408111645.KAA07094@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  
  Perry sez:
  UUNET, among others, considers itself to be a common carrier.

My understanding is that, legally speaking, "considering [oneself]
to be a common carrier" amounts to exactly nil -- that it requires
a special act of some governing body to declare you to be a common
carrier.   One might just as well consider oneself to be an
accredited diplomat and therefore to have diplomatic immunity.

Any of the real lawyers on the net care to comment?

	kitten





Thread