1994-08-04 - Re: clarification please

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Jamie Lawrence <jamiel@sybase.com>
Message Hash: 933eeb75341f5610adb654725225a716a5c999686a028958d92de9d8a136559b
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9408032137.A18180-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <9408032116.AA19332@ralph.sybgate.sybase.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-04 04:43:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Aug 94 21:43:45 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 94 21:43:45 PDT
To: Jamie Lawrence <jamiel@sybase.com>
Subject: Re: clarification please
In-Reply-To: <9408032116.AA19332@ralph.sybgate.sybase.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9408032137.A18180-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


C'punks,

On Wed, 3 Aug 1994, Jamie Lawrence wrote:

> ... Not that I am a clinton fan, I merely like giving
> credit where credit is due, and much of this (including, as has
> been oft stated here, the beginnings of clipper) belongs to those
> 12 years of republican mess making that got Clinton in office in
> the first place.

I don't think much is accomplished by arguing which set of liars got us
into any particular mess.  However, it was the *democrats* who dominated
the legislative and judicial branchs of government, as well as the
entrenched bureaucracy for the Ragan/Bush years.  I think that is a more
accurate version of "giving credit where credit is due."  Nevertheless,
please be advised, I dispise them all (and so should you).

Now get cracking and write some code.


 S a n d y









Thread