From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95550d0a43d35bf3a5c65757507c2b2ad11ee1e51fb3ca1b70ba5f006c549558
Message ID: <9408221928.AA14279@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-22 19:28:02 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Aug 94 12:28:02 PDT
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 94 12:28:02 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Voluntary Governments? (Not)
Message-ID: <9408221928.AA14279@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
<delete if this subject does not give you heart-thumping thrills>
From: Elton Wildermuth
It's not the case that any use of force defines a government. It _is_
the case that only government pretends to be the sole arbiter of who may
use force, and how much they may use.
......................................................................
There must exist cause which would inspire the use of force by an
individual, and there should exist just cause for the use of it by a
government as well.
Realistically there should be a recognition of when it might be logical
to resort to violence against another human, whether as an individual
or as a group.
Only a government pretends to be the sole arbiter of who may use force;
of course, everyone is supposed to have agreed on what justifies the
use of it, but this is interpreted to mean that individuals themselves
are not considered wise enough to make that decision at home alone. So
they're back to a defense-less state against potentially overwhelming odds.
Blanc
Return to August 1994
Return to “Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>”
1994-08-22 (Mon, 22 Aug 94 12:28:02 PDT) - Re: Voluntary Governments? (Not) - Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>