From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95c794656d6d1c9ae3598abfffe879ef5b0785c8dc9fa053675d1d2f2f1e260d
Message ID: <940813120832v2vjgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-13 17:11:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT
From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bug in PgP2.6???
Message-ID: <940813120832v2vjgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Ben.Goren@asu.edu writes:
> The EFF has sold us out, and this is making MIT look rather unprofessional.
Wild conspiracy theories aside for the moment, I back MIT on this
one. People are only beginning to get clued in as to what version the
current version is. Releasing a new version at this point, IMHO, would be
a MAJOR headache. If you've ever worked for a software company, and tried
to deal with the maintenance-version-of-the-day, you'll understand where
I'm coming from.
OTOH, guys [Hey you! MIT!], if it's an easy bug to fix, at least post
a SOURCE PATCH.
--Jeff
--
====== ====== +----------------jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us----------------+
== == | The new, improved, environmentally safe, bigger, better,|
== == -= | faster, hypo-allergenic, AND politically correct .sig. |
==== ====== | Now with a new fresh lemon scent! |
PGP Key Available +---------------------------------------------------------+
Return to August 1994
Return to “Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>”
1994-08-13 (Sat, 13 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT) - Re: Bug in PgP2.6??? - Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>