From: wb8foz@nrk.com (David Lesher)
To: smb@research.att.com
Message Hash: 991fe522eadd7df1f8973d73e1eb63d9940b0d8173225426c4e8a8e1eda544fb
Message ID: <m0qbsU3-000GmuC@nrk.com>
Reply To: <9408191433.AA08423@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-20 15:37:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Aug 94 08:37:09 PDT
From: wb8foz@nrk.com (David Lesher)
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 94 08:37:09 PDT
To: smb@research.att.com
Subject: Re: cypherpunks-digest V1 #18
In-Reply-To: <9408191433.AA08423@toad.com>
Message-ID: <m0qbsU3-000GmuC@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> The bill makes it a crime to possess or use an altered
> telecommunications instrument (such as a cellular
> telephone or scanning receiver) to obtain unauthorized
> access to telecommunications services (Sec. 9). This
> provision is intended to prevent the illegal use of
> cellular and other wireless communications services.
> Violations under this section face imprisonment for up
> to 15 years and a fine of up to $50,000.
Hmm....
Depending on how you read this, this can be a real can-o-worms.
First off, does it outlaw ANY receiver covering 800 mhz?
Second, consider software-only hacks to phones to monitor and collect
ESN's, etc. Now you are raided by the Powers-that-Rule, but hit the
scrooge-switch first so the phone forgets, & the evidence is gone.
Will they then claim the fact the phone remembers nothing as evidence
that it was altered? Or is erasing it "altering" too?
And how about test-equipment? The kind the celldealer has. And if you
modify it by replacing the power cord with a new one, or......
Return to August 1994
Return to “wb8foz@nrk.com (David Lesher)”