1994-08-11 - Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?

Header Data

From: “L. Todd Masco” <cactus@bb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a08ba3756583edc9b807d7cc574f4c588fbfcaf06a1676996394e7a2a5c44679
Message ID: <199408111732.NAA21237@bb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-11 17:26:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 10:26:28 PDT

Raw message

From: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@bb.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 10:26:28 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
Message-ID: <199408111732.NAA21237@bb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



According to a discussion I had with Dave Lawrence (postmaster at UUNET, as
 well as moderator of news.admin.newgroups), UUNET is registered with the FCC
 as an "Enhanced Service Provider," which, according to Dave, amounts to
 similar protection as "Common Carrier."  ("Common Carrier" seems to not
 be appropriate yet, since Congress is so behind the tech curve)
--
L. Todd Masco  |  Bibliobytes books on computer, on any UNIX host with e-mail
cactus@bb.com  | "Information wants to be free, but authors want to be paid."





Thread