1994-08-31 - Re: Civil crypto anarchy

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Message Hash: a0a618c5dd084de239480a3aa504a0b54d3caa75218649f479db6a9ab02c7302
Message ID: <199408311632.MAA22201@pipe1.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-31 16:33:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 09:33:23 PDT

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 09:33:23 PDT
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Subject: Re:  Civil crypto anarchy
Message-ID: <199408311632.MAA22201@pipe1.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Responding to msg by wcs@anchor.ho.att.com 
(bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204) on Tue, 30 
Aug  6:56 PM

>
>Sigh.  Unfortunately, governments have been quite 
>effective in making people more afraid of "anarchists" 
>than they are of  governments with nuclear 
>weapons.....

Yeah, it's been conventional wisdom around NYC since the 19th 
century that the best way to get some funding from LEAs was to 
set up a group with the word "anarchist" in it, or have an 
anarchist-like manifesto.

In the 80s the "commie bomb thrower" types were bitching that 
the money was moving out west to the "right wing gun nut" 
types.

Now long-time anarchist hustlers around here say that even the 
gray-haired cops bemoan Red-squad cut backs so that LEA money 
could go toward defeating "psychopath survivalists" and "the 
David Koreshes" and "murderous ex-defense workers".

To divert attention from the nuclear geopolitics of the 
Kissingers.





Thread