From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a4b67723ad288353f78289ea370db6eb8bdc3a32529ad2d691bbb8f60d307da7
Message ID: <199408161738.NAA20912@pipe3.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-16 17:38:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 10:38:36 PDT
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 10:38:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: In Search of Genuine DigiCash
Message-ID: <199408161738.NAA20912@pipe3.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Responding to msg by mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos) on Tue, 16 Aug
9:21 AM
>Ordinary counterfeiting is analog. Close inspection
>will always reveal differences which can be used to
>distinguish fake money.
However, NY Times Monday reported in long front-page article on
spread of digitized forged checks, including dupe of magnetic
ID.
Quotes:
"The proliferation of desktop publishing has brought a new
growth industry, the counterfeiting of virtually undetectable
fraudulent checks, and banks and law enforcement officials say
the cost to the economy could reach $1 billion this year.
* * *
The American Banking Association says [this] is the No. 1 crime
problem facing banks.
* * *
It is much easier counterfeiting checks than cash."
End quotes.
Says center of activity is California but has spread to all
parts of the US.
-------------------------------
My standard pitiful offer to send this article upon email
request.
John
Return to August 1994
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1994-08-16 (Tue, 16 Aug 94 10:38:36 PDT) - Re: In Search of Genuine DigiCash - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>