1994-08-12 - Re: EFF on why they did it.
Header Data
From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a7fd31ca37f1781c744f5237f0ce42a60159260c07e38cc5cb073153d6b8be96
Message ID: <9408121631.AA02707@bilbo.suite.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-12 16:31:38 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 09:31:38 PDT
Raw message
From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 09:31:38 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: EFF on why they did it.
Message-ID: <9408121631.AA02707@bilbo.suite.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> This spending cap is...a way to guarantee that carriers'
> expenses for electronic surveillance are truly paid for
> by the government, not by the customers.
>
Paid for "by the government"?!! And just where does the EFF think the
government gets its money? Are there any taxpayers out there who don't
use the phone systems? Looks like they're are going to get a big bill
from the government in the next few years.
I can't belive the EFF is actually using this as a pro argument. I can't
believe the EFF is supporting the Wiretap bill. The EFF is not getting
any more money from me.
Jim_Miller@suite.com
Thread
Return to August 1994
- Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”
- Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
Return to “wb8foz@nrk.com (David Lesher)”
- 1994-08-12 (Fri, 12 Aug 94 09:31:38 PDT) - Re: EFF on why they did it. - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
- 1994-08-12 (Fri, 12 Aug 94 11:24:21 PDT) - Profiting from the Wiretap Bill - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-08-13 (Fri, 12 Aug 94 21:40:06 PDT) - Re: EFF on why they did it. - wb8foz@nrk.com (David Lesher)