1994-08-30 - Re: Quibbling about “Forgeability”
Header Data
From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@netcom.com>
Message Hash: abc2673c3f9787c370b11eca40673a6508e369567ae08cccc5a9017f751a9493
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9408292107.A25133-0100000@zeus>
Reply To: <199408300025.RAA09312@netcom14.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-30 01:45:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:45:10 PDT
Raw message
From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:45:10 PDT
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Quibbling about "Forgeability"
In-Reply-To: <199408300025.RAA09312@netcom14.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9408292107.A25133-0100000@zeus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> This is, with due respect quibbling. "Unforgeable" and "unbreakable"
> are commonly used terms of art, which we (mostly) all know have
> caveats about computational power attached to them.
True; I, unfortunately, missed the context of that statement and took
it as a blind faith declaration rather than a reply to a question.
-jon
( THEY CAN STOP THE PARTY, BUT THEY CAN'T STOP THE FUTURE )
( --------------------[ entropy@intnet.net ]------------- )
Thread
Return to August 1994
- Return to “Greg Ecker <eckerg@acf2.NYU.EDU>”
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- Return to “Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>”
- Return to “Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
- Return to “Rolf Michelsen <Rolf.Michelsen@delab.sintef.no>”
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
- 1994-08-21 (Sun, 21 Aug 94 11:05:25 PDT) - e$ as “travellers check? - Jonathan Rochkind <jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu>
- 1994-08-22 (Mon, 22 Aug 94 05:46:54 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1994-08-23 (Mon, 22 Aug 94 23:41:21 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - Rolf Michelsen <Rolf.Michelsen@delab.sintef.no>
- 1994-08-29 (Sun, 28 Aug 94 23:33:46 PDT) - e$ as “travellers check? - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 13:45:14 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - Greg Ecker <eckerg@acf2.NYU.EDU>
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 13:50:03 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 15:54:16 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
- 1994-08-30 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 17:59:02 PDT) - Quibbling about “Forgeability” - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-08-30 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:45:10 PDT) - Re: Quibbling about “Forgeability” - Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
- 1994-08-30 (Tue, 30 Aug 94 05:26:49 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1994-08-30 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 17:59:02 PDT) - Quibbling about “Forgeability” - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 15:54:16 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 13:50:03 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1994-08-29 (Mon, 29 Aug 94 13:45:14 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - Greg Ecker <eckerg@acf2.NYU.EDU>
- 1994-08-22 (Mon, 22 Aug 94 05:46:54 PDT) - Re: e$ as “travellers check? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>