1994-08-06 - Re: RemailerNet

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk
Message Hash: bb184227bcee429ffd1e2a4c9212eeb0f5807dd0214dcb0f670b6a529e713e62
Message ID: <9408062108.AA18761@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <4094@aiki.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-06 21:07:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Aug 94 14:07:59 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 94 14:07:59 PDT
To: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: RemailerNet
In-Reply-To: <4094@aiki.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <9408062108.AA18761@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jim Dixon says:
> You can send from a very large network and forge your TCP/IP or
> (more difficult) Ethernet source address.  But I can sit on the same
> network, build a table relating TCP/IP to ethernet (or whatever)
> addresses, and filter out messages that should not be there.  There
> are commerical packages that do this sort of thing.

Huh?

If you are sitting on a network in England, which you appear to be, I
defy you to record anything at all about the ethernet addresses of the
machines that originated this message. I'll happily telnet to your
machine any time you like, and give you all the opportunity you like
to record the ethernet address of my packets. You might be on the same
internet, but you very likely have no access to the original physical
network, and you have no capacity to build any tables of any sort.

Perry





Thread