1994-08-12 - Re: Bug in PgP2.6???

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: claudel@netcom.com (Claude V. Lucas)
Message Hash: ce2b76f80a0ca1bb7c8e4e864bff03e31e91c1ff28b88bfd1cc0deb888494859
Message ID: <9408122306.AA23584@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199408122157.OAA10363@netcom8.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-12 23:06:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 16:06:50 PDT

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 16:06:50 PDT
To: claudel@netcom.com (Claude V. Lucas)
Subject: Re: Bug in PgP2.6???
In-Reply-To: <199408122157.OAA10363@netcom8.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9408122306.AA23584@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Gee, Claude, where have _you_ been hiding?  Look at the date
on that message.  

As for using 2.6 -- I do.  It's _only_ a factor in key generation,
and it doesn't weaken key generation enough to be a concern.

Also, there is a planned bugfix release for sometime soon that
will have the one character patch that fixes that problem.

-derek





Thread