From: Jason W Solinsky <solman@MIT.EDU>
To: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Message Hash: dd97a98983ded6e7d783a000d13eded49e335aecf495efdd1426e35a7d6e6279
Message ID: <9408220257.AA08968@ua.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <gate.JT4FRc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-22 02:58:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Aug 94 19:58:25 PDT
From: Jason W Solinsky <solman@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 94 19:58:25 PDT
To: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Subject: Re: Governing an information society - 3/4
In-Reply-To: <gate.JT4FRc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <9408220257.AA08968@ua.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> There may also be 'civil' suits in cyberspace. Due to digitally signed,
> undeniable contracts, these should be reduced to only those that involve a
> breach of contract, rather than a suspicion of invalidity.
I think that even this will be mitigated dramatically. In an information
economy there are relatively low bariers to obtaining cost information. I
would therefore expect cyberspatial contracts to ALWAYS have a breach clause
built in. It is always possible that something isn't going to go right and
a breach will occur. With the superior cost information available in
cyberspace, it should make sense to include detailed information on the
costs of a breach to the various parties. This reduces the cost of
adjudication and enables both parties to more precisely hedge the risks
they take as they enter into the agreement.
JWS
Return to August 1994
Return to “rishab@dxm.ernet.in”