1994-08-30 - Re: Arizona State Email Non-Privacy Policy

Header Data

From: NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
To: Richard Parratt <rparratt@london.micrognosis.com>
Message Hash: e9b55e943554080df23d940732c4dd8ec6219d040421bf87f1e9a4583a732f49
Message ID: <Pine.3.07.9408300711.N20920-b100000@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
Reply To: <9408300918.AA08344@pero>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-30 17:11:35 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT

Raw message

From: NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 10:11:35 PDT
To: Richard Parratt <rparratt@london.micrognosis.com>
Subject: Re: Arizona State Email Non-Privacy Policy
In-Reply-To: <9408300918.AA08344@pero>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9408300711.N20920-b100000@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> I'm sure this is the case in law, but to take an analogy,
> this is like banning employees from *receiving* private telephone
> calls. (Email has zero marginal cost to most institutions, as

Within the US Gov't it is not uncommon to be told that you are not to
receive personal phone calls on government time/government equipment.  Not
every office etc. enforces it, but it _is_ their equipment and you are
working on _their_ time.  Seems kinda harsh, but is legal and within their
rights.  Naturally emergencies are an exception.


-NetSurfer

#include standard.disclaimer

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
==  =    = |James D. Wilson        |V.PGP 2.7:   512/E12FCD 1994/03/17 >
 "  "    " |P. O. Box 15432        |     finger for full PGP key        >
 "  " /\ " |Honolulu, HI  96830    |====================================>
\"  "/  \" |Serendipitous Solutions|    Also NetSurfer@sersol.com      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>







Thread