From: nobody@vox.hacktic.nl (An0nYm0Us UsEr)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ec3f17ccce291166867d4b8e3220a180db079e6a305c40749c5d0d590533af10
Message ID: <199408130112.AA21528@xs4all.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-13 01:12:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 18:12:18 PDT
From: nobody@vox.hacktic.nl (An0nYm0Us UsEr)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 18:12:18 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199408130112.AA21528@xs4all.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Diogenes pondered:
> The only problem I see with the "everyone a remailer" concept is
> that, in the presence of traffic analysis, a locally generated
> message will show up as an imbalance between incoming and
> outgoing messages, will it not?
Don't most remailers have a 'bit bucket' address tho? Generating some bogus
bit-bucket messages would solve that problem...
Also, Ghio's remailer lets you put two (or more) messages inside a PGP
envelope, so in theory you could have one message go in and two come out.
There is the size problem tho. :(
Return to August 1994
Return to “nobody@vox.hacktic.nl (An0nYm0Us UsEr)”
1994-08-13 (Fri, 12 Aug 94 18:12:18 PDT) - No Subject - nobody@vox.hacktic.nl (An0nYm0Us UsEr)