From: kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fce3dab05c94d5adb2e83fb7df2f220d616b3c0f393a081ccec0ba312b0c5701
Message ID: <199408041618.AA29934@world.std.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-04 16:19:16 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Aug 94 09:19:16 PDT
From: kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 94 09:19:16 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Voluntary Governments
Message-ID: <199408041618.AA29934@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>The specific point about "imagine if they tied decision making power to
>how much you pay in taxes" was tried a while back: only tax-payers could
>vote. I'm all in favor of this, but I doubt many of my fellow citizens are.
>
>(And to some extent we have this, through bribes and influence-buying.
>Campaign contributions, etc.)
>
>Would anyone choose to pay more in taxes for an increased voting share?
>Hardly. Do the math on how influential any one vote is in an election. For
>specific cases, maybe. Again, that's how influence-peddling arises. Not a
>very healthy development, even for a cynic like me.
Heinlein suggested something similar (along with a few other "alternative"
forms of government) in the afterword to "Who Are The Heirs of Patrick
Henry" in _Expanded Universe_. Heinlein suggests:
"A State where anyone can buy for cash (or lay-away installment plan)
one or more franchises, and this is the government's sole source of
income other than services sold competitively and non-monopolistically.
This would produce a new type of government with several rabbits tucked
away in the hat. Rich people would take over the government? Would
the, now? Is a wealthy man going to impoverish himself for the privilege
of casting a couple of hundred votes? Buying an election today, under
the warm body (and tombstone) system is much cheaper than buying a
controlling number of franchises would be. The arithmetic on this
one becomes unsolvable...but I suspect that paying a stiff price (call
it 20,000 swiss francs) for a franchise would be even less popular
than serving for two years."
Personally, I favor his government that requires an intelligence/knowledge
test before a person can vote. I especially like his "Improving the Breed"
variation on this one. :-)
BTW, he also suggests the government in Twain's _The Curious Republic
of Gondor_, but I've never read this book. Can anyone describe the
goverment posited in this book?
Ken
=============================================================================
Ken Kirksey kkirksey@world.std.com Mac Guru & Developer
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
And the Clinton administration launched an attak on people in Texas because
those people were religious nuts with guns. Hell, this country was
FOUNDED by religious nuts with guns. - P.J. O'Rourke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAgUBLkD2AusZNYlu+zuBAQHsoQP9F/DcR8QUMpdCz7nfLlsUE1+kbJRDb6FC
h3/613tR3IqRcKCj15nIg0QLYGH+OtcgPRskAJypPupZOS7+IZkeUk2bOPg57K0t
H8UQbXY/xoc2WOUBKGsnXQnoBYQPvftU/M0V7t9ygVqGVFKIMapoVt+nXxYIsBLa
EV54B/+2fsg=
=KhXR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to August 1994
Return to “kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)”
1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 09:19:16 PDT) - Voluntary Governments - kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)