1994-09-28 - Re: SUFFERANCE remailers

Header Data

From: Breakdown <genie@gate.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0daddea8da43f649b4c458eb6ce7e99821ad9c227396e852e6aa9dc2521d69b0
Message ID: <Pine.A32.3.90.940928005057.59280C-100000@hopi.gate.net>
Reply To: <9409280438.AA10300@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-28 04:52:51 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Sep 94 21:52:51 PDT

Raw message

From: Breakdown <genie@gate.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 94 21:52:51 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SUFFERANCE remailers
In-Reply-To: <9409280438.AA10300@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.90.940928005057.59280C-100000@hopi.gate.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 27 Sep 1994, Gary Jeffers wrote:

>                   SUFFERANCE REMAILERS
[snip]
>    Definition of FORTRESS REMAILER: A remailer whose physical location
> cannot be found. ; a remailer that does not require the consent of
> the State. ; a Freedom remailer.
> 
Hm, aren't European remailers something "like" Fortress remailers? The 
State surely doesn't require consent for anon.penet.fi or such and no one 
in the US(well I hope no one) knows the physical location of it... And 
you can post just about anything through that one :)....

	Genie

--
Finger <genie@gate.net> for a PGP key
Send PGP preferrably. 
PEACE - Live it or rest *IN* it...






Thread