From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0de4ba2faf53dffddcdec2aaf722fa9fb8e3b60323bc189e3dd66a78d5c43b20
Message ID: <9409282204.AA01197@mycroft.rand.org>
Reply To: <9409282126.AA00174@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-28 22:04:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 15:04:44 PDT
From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 15:04:44 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: 3DES
In-Reply-To: <9409282126.AA00174@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
Message-ID: <9409282204.AA01197@mycroft.rand.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie) writes:
> triple DES uses:
> Eabc(x) = Ea(Db(Ec(x)))
> as opposed to:
> Eabc(x) = Ea(Eb(Ec(x)))
> in order to preserve some symmetry properties. Can anyone give a
> better explanation?
OK -- if you want to retain compatibility with old 56-bit DES chips
in your same network, you can set a = b = c and get:
Eaaa(x) = Ea(Da(Ea(x)))
using the first form, which reduces to Ea(x), or a single 56-bit DES
encryption instead of the 168 bits your TripleDES chip can handle. The
second form doesn't have this property or any other useful property other
than standalone security, since DES isn't a group.
Jim Gillogly
Highday, 7 Winterfilth S.R. 1994, 22:03
Return to September 1994
Return to “pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)”