1994-09-05 - Ethics of Anonymous Remailers (Re: Needed for a computer ethics class)

Header Data

From: ghio@kaiwan.com (Matthew Ghio)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2a66b7df88524405c9b93ba189861d6c8207273e4e848f71816ef5aa43d980e3
Message ID: <9409051540.AA15978@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-05 15:40:43 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 08:40:43 PDT

Raw message

From: ghio@kaiwan.com (Matthew Ghio)
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 08:40:43 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Ethics of Anonymous Remailers (Re: Needed for a computer ethics class)
Message-ID: <9409051540.AA15978@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 1994 11:09:40 -0600
> From: Patrick Juola <juola@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Needed for a computer ethics class
>
>
> Does anyone have a concise, citeable statement about why anonymous
> remailers are a good thing?  Some sort of position statment by
> Julf would be ideal.  Similarly, if anyone has something for the
> *other* side of the coin, I'd love to see that.
> 
> I'm in the process of writing a course on computer ethics for
> the University of Colorado at Boulder and I think anonymous
> remailers would be a good subject for an essay assignment, but
> I need enough material (ideally, primary source material) to
> lay the groundwork first.
> 
>         Patrick

No, but it's something that I often get asked.  I would be interested to hear
examples of good things that people are using my anonymous remailer for.





Thread