From: Patrick Juola <juola@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2c8da18eb05b4dcd95d986b1c9e806bc5c30794297720192a2a2725e7038e521
Message ID: <199409021709.LAA00722@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-02 17:10:56 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Sep 94 10:10:56 PDT
From: Patrick Juola <juola@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 94 10:10:56 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Needed for a computer ethics class
Message-ID: <199409021709.LAA00722@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Does anyone have a concise, citeable statement about why anonymous
remailers are a good thing? Some sort of position statment by
Julf would be ideal. Similarly, if anyone has something for the
*other* side of the coin, I'd love to see that.
I'm in the process of writing a course on computer ethics for
the University of Colorado at Boulder and I think anonymous
remailers would be a good subject for an essay assignment, but
I need enough material (ideally, primary source material) to
lay the groundwork first.
Patrick
Return to September 1994
Return to “Patrick Juola <juola@suod.cs.colorado.edu>”