From: blancw@pylon.com
To: hart@chaos.bsu.edu
Message Hash: 38bd2691a16c0f669de5c31adc2642617152bc2205aa2b1694e29824e16d502b
Message ID: <199409200626.XAA27603@deepthought.pylon.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-20 06:27:21 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Sep 94 23:27:21 PDT
From: blancw@pylon.com
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 94 23:27:21 PDT
To: hart@chaos.bsu.edu
Subject: Virtual Liability and Lethal Arguments
Message-ID: <199409200626.XAA27603@deepthought.pylon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Responding to msg by Jim Hart:
>What about liability of non designers for failing to
>make changes? What about liability of people who use
>fallacious moralistic arguments and use coercion to
>stop changes?
.................................................................
..........
You don't really have a problem with that, do you? :>)
There are no expectations placed on non-designers to come up
with anything of any practical use to society, therefore they
have no responsibility or liability, as no one takes them very
seriously.
People who put up blocks to progress and improvement (not
merely 'changes' per se) are suffering from a sense of loss of
control over their existence, and should be sent to a hospital
to recuperate from their psychic wounds. (Actually, I think
that this wouldn't become such a big problem if, for one thing,
everyone had a clear understanding & appreciation of the
concept of "property", what that constitutes, and what that
means in terms of the liberty to affect things in the world
around us.)
Blanc
Return to September 1994
Return to “blancw@pylon.com”
1994-09-20 (Mon, 19 Sep 94 23:27:21 PDT) - Virtual Liability and Lethal Arguments - blancw@pylon.com