From: Alex Strasheim <alex@omaha.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 51179565c98bdeded91892fa055a63103b584642717105e4ee12011002a6968e
Message ID: <199409202320.SAA00228@omaha.omaha.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-20 23:19:33 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Sep 94 16:19:33 PDT
From: Alex Strasheim <alex@omaha.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 94 16:19:33 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: On the crime bill and remailers
Message-ID: <199409202320.SAA00228@omaha.omaha.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hal said:
> I strongly disagree with this. Anonymous remailers as presently
> constructed will be almost completely ineffective against any significant
> government attempts to surveil email traffic. The government does have
> the resources today to defeat most uses of remailers. Since present-day
> remailers lack padding features, the correspondence between incoming and
> outgoing messages, even with encryption, is relatively easy to establish.
> This is made worse by the lack of general support for reordering, which
> renders the task almost trivial.
Although it does seem that the government ought to be able to track
remailer traffic, is there any evidence that they are actually doing it in
the real world? I've seen posts on usenet which would have presumably
provoked a reaction from police, but I can't remember hearing of any
cases in which such surveilance occured.
==
Alex Strasheim
alex@omaha.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBLn9tpREpP7+baaPtAQHrewQAvJW8zUIQb57XwHHsdGC7gJo9UyFfds4o
hu1vTUEsZvzyYJL7BIVgDEnHowVZ6vWyKky2QW+CiYli6Ulo8zFN5zoeWS09vLx2
/pANQPxXC+o61C1rypiR85D/esJ7a7ZRJu8OI5sa98+eLmDDad/j/768OMmFwR8c
iI8ZnV2PCbQ=
=DwQt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1994
Return to “Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>”