From: “Patrick G. Bridges” <bridges@cs.arizona.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 587972617cb62e4cdb3651435eaac40c0f90e1c35dcc7eb4b1934895d61e1006
Message ID: <199409150624.AA01543@hummingbird.cs.arizona.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-15 06:24:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 23:24:12 PDT
From: "Patrick G. Bridges" <bridges@cs.arizona.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 94 23:24:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RC4 Legal Issues
Message-ID: <199409150624.AA01543@hummingbird.cs.arizona.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
So what does the publication of the reverse engineering of RC4
mean legally? AT&T claimed trade sevret and copyright protection
over code that was pretty well known in the BSDI case...
Can RC4 still be construed as a trade secret or proprirtary to
RSADS and Bizdos or are, as I understand from previous messages,
we free to use RC4 now (ignoring the submarine patent issue)?
Return to September 1994
Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”