From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
To: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Message Hash: 60670f5ced88108b6e5e93ab2025a20c1f1882d731cd062f92996d016716c52a
Message ID: <9409212020.AA04634@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
Reply To: <gate.0e91sc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-21 19:17:15 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Sep 94 12:17:15 PDT
From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 94 12:17:15 PDT
To: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Subject: Re: Reserved DC-Net IP addresses - NOT!
In-Reply-To: <gate.0e91sc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <9409212020.AA04634@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
>
> I don't agree. Apart from the IP address crunch that already poses a problem
> for the IETF, I don't see why DC-Nets should be limited to specially allocated
> addresses. DC-Nets should be implemented a layer over protocols such as IP,
> or as extensions to them. It should be possible for _anyone_, regardless of
> IP address (officially allocated DC-Net number) to connect with _any_ others
> on a DCN, with some software or other interfacing.
>
Ditto.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Paul Ferguson
US Sprint
Managed Network Engineering tel: 703.904.2437
Herndon, Virginia USA internet: paul@hawk.sprintmrn.com
Return to September 1994
Return to “rishab@dxm.ernet.in”