From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95c8a87d97d4e40a8ed68c2c8e2104991f79767f1a14e425e876d656e1a158e6
Message ID: <199409100338.UAA09358@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: <199409091646.MAA16843@bwh.harvard.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-10 03:38:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 20:38:50 PDT
From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 20:38:50 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: digital reputation capital
In-Reply-To: <199409091646.MAA16843@bwh.harvard.edu>
Message-ID: <199409100338.UAA09358@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu> writes:
> I'm currently writing up a design for a digital reputation
>capital system. The intent is not to provide a framework for
>licensing or formal endorsement system, but instead, allow people to
>automatically discover the opinions of others about various entities.
At one time there was something similar to this called the Hawthorne
Exchange (or HEX) associated with the Extropians list. Various entities
(like people and nyms, and later, confusingly, ideas) could be registered
and people could buy and sell "shares" in these registered entities.
The market price of a share was supposed to in some sense represent
the value of the reputation. At least, that's how I understood it. The
goals were never 100% clear to me.
It did not seem to work very well. You need to give people an
incentive to participate, to register their opinions. Because you
could actually make "monetary units" by buying low and selling high,
there seemed to be a lot of volatility and price manipulation in the
market, especially since there wasn't much to tie the prices to
reality. You might check on the Extropians list for more information.
Hal
Return to September 1994
Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”