From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9f8c77cc77b021272a6e158e3a9c752a6885b94c97f4535e9e0e73f0f64c5e24
Message ID: <9409151418.AA03778@ah.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-15 14:57:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Sep 94 07:57:54 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 94 07:57:54 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RC4 Legal Issues
Message-ID: <9409151418.AA03778@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Some general words on trade secrets.
Trade secret law is eminently sensible. It grows out of common law
and the merits and facts of real situations regarding information.
Trade secret law does not attempt to reverse the disclosure of
information, which would be contrary to the properties of information.
It does not require that people forget something they have learned.
Nor does trade secret law force tribute upon those who use that
knowledge, as patent law does. It does not restrict the transmission
of information, as copyright law does.
If, however, you tell someone you're going to keep a secret, and they
compensate you for that promise (i.e. consideration in a contract),
then the law expects you to uphold your promise or make good the harm
that you've caused. Lacking an agreement, the holder of the agreement
has no recourse.
In a cryptographic world, the model of trade secret law is worth
considering. It concerns only information and agreements between
individuals.
Eric
Return to September 1994
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
1994-09-15 (Thu, 15 Sep 94 07:57:54 PDT) - RC4 Legal Issues - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)