From: macorp!moonlight!ken@uu4.psi.com (Ken Landaiche)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: acf12259f5e95d28b41c732ebac7eff4acba4d5e20ec17ce26c23c5f85927072
Message ID: <9408310328.AA02830@moonlight.noname>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-12 22:46:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Sep 94 15:46:00 PDT
From: macorp!moonlight!ken@uu4.psi.com (Ken Landaiche)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 94 15:46:00 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: reputation credit 1-3
Message-ID: <9408310328.AA02830@moonlight.noname>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In my varied experience with performance appraisals, I have found that
one person's "respect 50%" is another person's "respect 90%". Collecting
reputation endorsements from many people would have to include this wide
margin of error. In practice, when the reputation system reached critical
mass, it would develop a norm for how much to trust the average respect
number. In fact, the stabilization of this reputation norm is one
criterion for reaching the critical mass.
Ken
Return to September 1994
Return to “macorp!moonlight!ken@uu4.psi.com (Ken Landaiche)”
1994-09-12 (Mon, 12 Sep 94 15:46:00 PDT) - Re: reputation credit 1-3 - macorp!moonlight!ken@uu4.psi.com (Ken Landaiche)