From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c626664f300acbebfb2b89669079d6bb815a59a29c2a963b04d1bbdfc80ae582
Message ID: <9409271132.AA11917@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-27 11:32:55 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Sep 94 04:32:55 PDT
From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 94 04:32:55 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Quantum cryptanalysis thread on sci.crypt
Message-ID: <9409271132.AA11917@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Constraints of time mean I've been skimming thru' c'punx a bit lately,
but I was wondering if anyone here has any views on the quantum
crytanalysis thread that has been gracing sci.crypt of late.
I haven't noticed it here but maybe I missed it (in which case - sorry guys).
I first read about it in New Scientist (24 Sept 94) No 1944, p 21.
the upshot being that if there is any mileage in the quantum computing
idea, then it may lead to computers that can rapidly factorise
primes (not good news for RSA).
The main objections of skeptics are that noise/defects of manufacture make such
quantum computers unfeasible. On the other hand, the New Scientist Article
suggests that the technology for making a quantum computer may not be that
far away. This may be just sensationalism, but even if its only a
dim possibility in 25 years time its got to be worth a mention.
Given the recent developments in materials science I don't think the
possibility of manufacturing such things can be ruled out as some
suggested on sci.crypt. The matter of being swamped by noise may be
an insurmountable problem, and anyway is not something I am qualified to
comment on.
Any well informed people out there with any comments?
Sherry
Return to September 1994
Return to “Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>”
1994-09-27 (Tue, 27 Sep 94 04:32:55 PDT) - Quantum cryptanalysis thread on sci.crypt - Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp2.anu.edu.au>