1994-09-18 - Re: Stealth remailers

Header Data

From: Matthew Ghio <ghio@chaos.bsu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d463c7c58e6dbc03451a811acf1c145dacd86421add2f80163c5afbe26860771
Message ID: <199409180357.WAA21905@chaos.bsu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-18 03:51:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Sep 94 20:51:45 PDT

Raw message

From: Matthew Ghio <ghio@chaos.bsu.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 94 20:51:45 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Stealth remailers
Message-ID: <199409180357.WAA21905@chaos.bsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com> wrote:

> Some time back I proposed a variation of this idea: "second tier"
> remailers, which always forward their outgoing messages through
> one or more "first tier" remailers, which work like the current ones
> and take the political heat as a result.  Second tier remailers would
> be very safe to run and it would be rare that a sysop or supervisor
> would get a complaint about the remailer's activity.

ftp cs.cmu.edu
cd /afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr12/mg5n/public/remailer
get ghio.cp-remailer.tar.gz

gunzip & untar

Change the following line in the readheaders.c,
in the block_addr function:
  if (match==1) address[0]=0;
to
  if (match!=1) address[0]=0;

Your blocked.addresses file is now a pass-addresses file.
Put the email addresses of other remailers in the file.
You now have a stealth remailer.

Now, EVERYONE should go do this RIGHT NOW!
No more excuses for not running remailers...  :)





Thread