From: blancw@pylon.com
To: solman@MIT.EDU
Message Hash: def7f5eb7a32a234d851e7b8f60ce0a93abe396b8b84c378964687391c41f899
Message ID: <199409012044.NAA09075@deepthought.pylon.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-01 20:43:41 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 13:43:41 PDT
From: blancw@pylon.com
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 94 13:43:41 PDT
To: solman@MIT.EDU
Subject: (Fwd) Re: Problems with anonymous escrow 2--response
Message-ID: <199409012044.NAA09075@deepthought.pylon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Responding to msg by solman@MIT.EDU
The skills of an entity without any reputation capital are
absolutely worthless. But usually an anonymous entity will come
around brandishing all sorts of certifications (reputation
capital).
..........................................................
Well, I was thinking that certifications & reputations wouldn't
mean all that much to me, nor either knowing or being
unfamiliar with someone's identity (or pseudonymousness). I
would be more convinced with a demo. Something which could
demostrate facility or ability would be more valuable to me
than a second-hand proof. I realize some professions cannot
provide such demonstrations, but I myself would rather have a
way of making decisions based on the excercise of first-hand
judgement whenever possible.
This anonymity/identity and certification/reputation business
appears something like trying to have one's cake and eat it,
too, as the expression goes. A featureless landscape with
remote associations to actual substance so as to both please
the aloof-ers & appease the uncertain. It's a bit paradoxical
that for every method which is found by which to hide, another
method is found by which to reveal what was heretofore
undetectable in Nature. While scientists push back the
envelope & reveal what was previously 'invisible' to our eyes,
others work to effect stealth techniques against the tools of
Consciousness. Kind of strange, though interesting.
Blanc
Return to September 1994
Return to “blancw@pylon.com”
1994-09-01 (Thu, 1 Sep 94 13:43:41 PDT) - (Fwd) Re: Problems with anonymous escrow 2–response - blancw@pylon.com