From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ff7a8475c2bdb0312e676d18d5dbac088fdbc9f04208d2f7c203b625679aaf3e
Message ID: <9409172236.AA12780@ah.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-09-17 23:15:28 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Sep 94 16:15:28 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 94 16:15:28 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: On the crime bill and remailers
Message-ID: <9409172236.AA12780@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Even the crime bill doesn't apply _ex post facto_, meaning anything
newly illegal under the crime bill wasn't illegal before it. In
particular, any discussion about remailers, discussion which has
already happened and which might be construed as conspiracy for a
newly illegal action, cannot now be subject to the terms of a new
bill. Even more in particular, any discussion of remailers that has
already happened is perfectly safe.
And as for me, I don't plan on shutting up now.
Eric
Return to September 1994
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
1994-09-17 (Sat, 17 Sep 94 16:15:28 PDT) - On the crime bill and remailers - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)