1994-10-06 - Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow
Header Data
From: Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>
To: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
Message Hash: 1c6bde572e7b198d1b7fc31b0b95d880a71043a888181ad195590903f2fbbf5f
Message ID: <9410061226.AA47263@elfbook.intercon.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-06 16:27:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 09:27:07 PDT
Raw message
From: Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 09:27:07 PDT
To: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow
Message-ID: <9410061226.AA47263@elfbook.intercon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> The Government seems to choose its terminology carefully in cases
> where that terminology can affect the politics of a situation. I
> suggest that we start referring to key escrow as "key forfeiture".
Phil, you're brilliant.
"Key forfeiture" it is.
Amanda Walker
InterCon Systems Corporation
Thread
Return to October 1994
Return to “Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>”
1994-10-06 (Thu, 6 Oct 94 09:27:07 PDT) - Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow - Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>