1994-10-06 - Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow

Header Data

From: Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>
To: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
Message Hash: 1c6bde572e7b198d1b7fc31b0b95d880a71043a888181ad195590903f2fbbf5f
Message ID: <9410061226.AA47263@elfbook.intercon.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-06 16:27:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 09:27:07 PDT

Raw message

From: Amanda Walker <amanda@intercon.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 09:27:07 PDT
To: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow
Message-ID: <9410061226.AA47263@elfbook.intercon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> The Government seems to choose its terminology carefully in cases 
> where that terminology can affect the politics of a situation.  I 
> suggest that we start referring to key escrow as "key forfeiture". 

Phil, you're brilliant.

"Key forfeiture" it is.


Amanda Walker
InterCon Systems Corporation







Thread