1994-10-06 - Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow

Header Data

From: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Message Hash: 30bc9b615fe6dd5e8ea6dcfc37212d34519c24c2a4aa8374234ead59aadc133e
Message ID: <m0qspDz-0002wCC@maalox.ppgs.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-06 09:35:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 02:35:12 PDT

Raw message

From: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 02:35:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Subject: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow
Message-ID: <m0qspDz-0002wCC@maalox.ppgs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


The Government seems to choose its terminology carefully in cases where
that terminology can affect the politics of a situation.  I suggest
that we start referring to key escrow as "key forfeiture".

Philip Zimmermann

Thread

• Return to October 1994

• Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
• Return to ““David M. Harvey I” <warrior@infinet.com>”

• Return to “Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>”

• 1994-10-06 (Thu, 6 Oct 94 02:35:12 PDT) - Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow - Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
  • 1994-10-06 (Thu, 6 Oct 94 09:04:07 PDT) - Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow - “David M. Harvey I” <warrior@infinet.com>
  • 1994-10-06 (Thu, 6 Oct 94 10:35:35 PDT) - Re: Key Forfeiture, not Key Escrow - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>