1994-10-03 - Re: EFFy Wiretap Win?

Header Data

From: “M. Hedlund” <hedlund@halcyon.com>
To: psmarie@cbis.com
Message Hash: 4b11b5d6fe964c1cf7beba8c841becc25eaa75508e185df017140e53a966488f
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.90.941003083831.6471A-100000@halcyon.com>
Reply To: <9410031115.AA10394@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-03 15:42:34 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Oct 94 08:42:34 PDT

Raw message

From: "M. Hedlund" <hedlund@halcyon.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 94 08:42:34 PDT
To: psmarie@cbis.com
Subject: Re: EFFy Wiretap Win?
In-Reply-To: <9410031115.AA10394@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.90.941003083831.6471A-100000@halcyon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Mon, 3 Oct 1994, Paul J. Ste. Marie wrote:
> >  A similar measure sailed through the Senate
> > Judiciary Committee earlier this week on a 16-1
> > vote. Though little time remains in the current
> > Congress, the legislation could squeak through.
> 
> Does anyone know who the lone honorable Senator was?

Voter's Telecomm Watch (Shabbir J. Safdar <shabbir@panix.com>) told me 
the vote was unanimous.  Their recent "Wiretap Watch" lists a bunch of 
Senators who voted to let it leave the committee, but none who wanted to 
kill it.  The Legi-Slate Congressional database service says only that 
it was approved by a voice vote.

</hedlund>





Thread