From: Istvan von Keszi <vkisosza@nucleus.com>
To: Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Message Hash: 7ccc838e8222de0f67ecacbcfcea25ed580ff744a282b865d4031596cad34cce
Message ID: <Pine.BSI.3.90.941003125455.23080B-100000@bsdi.nucleus.com>
Reply To: <199410031350.GAA04690@kiwi.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-03 19:13:33 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Oct 94 12:13:33 PDT
From: Istvan von Keszi <vkisosza@nucleus.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 94 12:13:33 PDT
To: Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: List of reliable remailers
In-Reply-To: <199410031350.GAA04690@kiwi.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.90.941003125455.23080B-100000@bsdi.nucleus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 3 Oct 1994, Raph Levien wrote:
> I have written and installed a remailer pinging script which
> collects detailed information about remailer features and reliability.
>
> To use it, just finger remailer-list@kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu
Thanks Raph. This is very helpful for those of us who are code
handicapped. This is very helpful as a general guide.
Unfortunately, I've found that the information that it provides does not
help me with remailer reliability. I've seen a remailer that supposedly
has a latency of 8 or 9 hours, actually delay 24.
This makes your script fairly ineffectual.
You can't do diddly with bad data ...
--
Istvan.
Return to October 1994
Return to “Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>”