1994-10-06 - Re: Government vs. Markets

Header Data

From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 94ed3a22dd34b63b042c4691c10bbda3a537bfc95ac0b9924d000be18a43f5e3
Message ID: <9410060248.AA14934@ininx>
Reply To: <9410052253.AA29033@doom.intuit.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-10-06 02:49:15 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Oct 94 19:49:15 PDT

Raw message

From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 94 19:49:15 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Government vs. Markets
In-Reply-To: <9410052253.AA29033@doom.intuit.com>
Message-ID: <9410060248.AA14934@ininx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen) writes:

> If it is argued that
> corporations are different because, as an employee of a corporation, I
> am free to terminate my employment contract and to enter a contract
> with a different corporation, then it can also be argued that, as a
> citizen of the U.S., I am free to terminate my citizenship and assume
> citizenship in another country.

- From the frying pan into the fire?  Why assume another?  Why not drop
your U.S. citizenship and be done with it?

Can't be done you say? (*)  Then this is a significant difference between
terminating employment and terminating citizenship.  Employees regularly
terminate and go it alone forever after.

(*) You may be right.  Their statute may not provide for citizenship
termination unless you first go to a place over which they don't claim
jurisdiction.  Good reason to never affirm that citizenship in the first
place.

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	jkreznar@ininx.com	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLpNkysDhz44ugybJAQF9CQP/fdh3P4YYy4gvvm6kE8JkQmy4IkCQTxfd
Jqg6m95fZokW28hmd8ogPa6wlcyr6qvWWrL9wb+7IMNf34BhV+8KJK/2tsgM496o
PEruV31ucpbLNa97o81keZcp3F0gJeNjZiZO+1fl20R0ZvGmc3zArPsBebN24rJQ
LRReyyIZ4Bs=
=A9ZC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread