1994-11-20 - Re: SPOOF SENDERS?

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0944a7d709f79d3d7797cae329c1db4d4d00c6c051ba7029657cfa14a9a4e32f
Message ID: <199411200346.AA21554@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: <199411192018.OAA08310@jpunix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-20 03:47:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Nov 94 19:47:40 PST

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 94 19:47:40 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SPOOF SENDERS?
In-Reply-To: <199411192018.OAA08310@jpunix.com>
Message-ID: <199411200346.AA21554@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

An anonymous author writes:

> If I use remailers to obtain privacy / low profile,
> why would I want to use a remailer that advertises itself as such?
> Rather, I'd prefer a nice little quiet one so my messages would blend in
> with all the rest of the usenet junk.

> I hate the five lines of disclaimers.

> I'd pay for my remailing if I could (and will when the feature becomes
> available), but I'd take my business to the discreet firm of _Chaemeleon
> Remailers S.A._ - not to all the _Remailers 'R' Us_ that advertise their
> business in neon on top of my messages.

Why not go to one of the commercial providers or Freenets and ask 
for an account under a pseudonym? I don't get the impression that
Netcom cares what your account name is, and I imagine the other providers
are too busy to play identity police. If they're feeling picky and
you're feeling accomodating, tell them you want to pay for an account
for a roommate/spouse/partner/adopted child who doesn't have a 
checkbook/VISA card. 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBLs7GjX3YhjZY3fMNAQHSzwP+LCTo8TrztmRL0m+wtn0AWugS5wsFJqKn
VRDqfpiXdJHhIS+MlzuQSZ3wcC0krOW1IPYGShmb5QNU1rD1Y5in5cS0OJsvJl1+
Oc4fxEz1gsKDE6yU9m/ce8uWGcW3GbrXdlIC7LKx8AOaXsfjx2338kpfJ9vYpmWF
/+XSeq6K4fs=
=plJv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Thread