From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 124ec540a132870c24226b686381ef0e4ef4f3ae1c110454818dc5592ba1dd3e
Message ID: <5MxokyczBCCV073yn@netcom.com>
Reply To: <9411162343.AA14429@homer.spry.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-17 22:11:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Nov 94 14:11:10 PST
From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 94 14:11:10 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Spelling Flame -- Hit 'D' Now (Was Re: wreaking havoc on the net)
In-Reply-To: <9411162343.AA14429@homer.spry.com>
Message-ID: <5MxokyczBCCV073yn@netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <9411162343.AA14429@homer.spry.com>, bshantz@spry.com wrote:
> I think Tim May went over this once a few months back about why he doesn't
> like people mailing him little puissant messages that don't really need to be
^^^^^^^^
> encrypted, but they encrypt them anyway.
The word I think you mean to use is "pissant." "Puissant" means
"powerful." A puissant message probably should be encrypted.
|
Alan Bostick | "Stand back! I've got a dictionary, and
abostick@netcom.com | I'm not afraid to use it!"
finger for PGP public key |
Key fingerprint: |
50 22 FB 46 41 A3 17 9D F7 33 FF E1 4E 1C 89 79 +legal_kludge=off
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQB1AgUBLsu3OuVevBgtmhnpAQFUGgMAkp7qap0GWkBgKOahogc08laoSdnhlfsc
2T4B/biKRCf95sLdsX7VwIurpe/cZOx4AFxvN01oDM1KD6CI77RPZnQv1fsV16V5
t5y3zELND3CD5h5AQBBvDZkiJfZdQGsm
=87Bi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to November 1994
Return to “abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)”
Unknown thread root