From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: jya@pipeline.com
Message Hash: 15a4a116fa928a13d0a097dff56ff7ecbb38963e5bb7b640a526559f0372e8b1
Message ID: <9411231924.AA08431@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-23 20:04:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 12:04:41 PST
From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 12:04:41 PST
To: jya@pipeline.com
Subject: Re: (Fwd) news spoke
Message-ID: <9411231924.AA08431@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This is the infamous "CERT Monitoring Warning Meme". Essentially,
it doesn't mean that your administrators *are* going to monitor you,
it just means that you've been warned, so it's not illegal under
ECPA to do it if they feel like, because you consented by using the system
knowing it was one of the terms for use. Unfortunately, there's no
very good way to implement "Authorized users will not be monitored
but unauthorized users cracking in will be", which is the real intent
of most people putting up the warning - any system which could implement
that could have kept the crackers off in the first place....
Bill
Return to November 1994
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)”
1994-11-23 (Wed, 23 Nov 94 12:04:41 PST) - Re: (Fwd) news spoke - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)