From: “JEFF LICQUIA (CEI)” <JLICQUIA@mhc.uiuc.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 271b78e30d252796bb6f616b26befe2a667ca744f7d1b46f81e6a9ddff6d7bad
Message ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.941130155708.416@mhc.uiuc.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-30 21:59:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 13:59:01 PST
From: "JEFF LICQUIA (CEI)" <JLICQUIA@mhc.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 13:59:01 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Auto-Verifying of Sigs
Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.941130155708.416@mhc.uiuc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thinking about this requiring/checking sigs thing, I thought of
something...
Really, the only "unknown" with signed messages is whether they are valid
or not; it's pretty easy to distinguish the unsigned posts. Furthermore,
it seems to be my observation with verifying digsigs (as I do in
non-crypto groups I subscribe to) that the vast majority of sigs will
turn up OK. It seems, therefore, that expending a lot of effort to
change the current list to allow this would be wasteful considering the
relatively few times that it would produce any useful information.
May I propose a "better" way (you be the judge here): Proxy the job.
Have a 'bot subscribe to the list (through whatever way), armed with a
complete keyserver keyring. Its only function is to check all signed
messages from the list. Unsigned messages, messages with sigs that
checked OK, and messages signed with unknown keys would generate no
response from the 'bot. A failed sig, however, would cause the 'bot to
send a (digitally signed, optionally) message to the list to the effect
of "This message here didn't check OK" (complete with disclaimers and
warnings about trusting authorities blindly).
This would be a totally automated way of checking sigs, and wouldn't
involve any new code on the list's part. Those who didn't want the
intruding messages could killfile the 'bot, and the rest of us wouldn't
be bothered with redundant information on every post.
What say ye all? I can tentatively volunteer my business account to do
the work (have to talk to my boss about it first, as that account has to
pay for volume and phone time). I'll play with some code in the meantime
and see what I can come up with.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBLtz1EjER5KvPRd0NAQEx7gP+IlVoJG1YVXKmQViVCtabX1owrH2MHDBg
MpKBq7T6NbPMTDUWLE7HNWTfw5BvZbSCC1uRRM2rKV6xHZPxU0buUsoDc5QLT10b
xYbs9/j81dlTve7/fMToJjNJuls61289XaOIlfPN+sBIGX1TwrtDKek6To8GsdAN
YmkUYUUFzL8=
=3fF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to December 1994
Return to ““JEFF LICQUIA (CEI)” <JLICQUIA@mhc.uiuc.edu>”