1994-11-30 - Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?

Header Data

From: Mark Grant <mark@unicorn.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 475f5f9cb3e6310008359a7cea64eb6aa6d2c86becef268862016a602c782c95
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9411302253.A29304-0100000@unicorn.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-30 22:19:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 14:19:01 PST

Raw message

From: Mark Grant <mark@unicorn.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 14:19:01 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9411302253.A29304-0100000@unicorn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 30 Nov 1994, The new cypherpunks signature checking agent wrote:

> The below message was found to have a valid signature from "JEFF LICQUIA (CEI)
> " JLICQUIA@mhc.uiuc.edu.

If you're going to do this, I'd much prefer that you put this in the
header or in a Comment: field in the PGP block. My mail program
automatically verifies all signed messages (except those that get trashed
by MIME-mailers), but if it's got cack like this at the top of the message
then it (deliberately) displays the whole thing and doesn't verify the
signature.

This is in some respects a bug in my program, however I've been unable to 
come up with a sensible method of dealing with messages when only part of
them is signed.

			Mark






Thread