From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 4ed831e51222002ed3f8c809cf87e1bec1a2e08270888d87940c540f2033ef3d
Message ID: <199411290736.XAA17767@netcom6.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199411290628.WAA22841@netcom13.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-29 07:37:46 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Nov 94 23:37:46 PST
From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 94 23:37:46 PST
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: "You aren't following the _rules_!"
In-Reply-To: <199411290628.WAA22841@netcom13.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199411290736.XAA17767@netcom6.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lucky Green wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Eric wrote:
> >I am still considering the "sign-or-delay" proposal for the toad.com
> >server, that is, sign your articles to the list or they'll be delayed
> >and eventually rejected.
>
> Do it. Either it will work or it will kill the list. If it works, geat. If
> it kills the list, we would have failed in our mission anyway.
>
Yes, do it! Do it now! Do it tonight! I spend too much time reading
this list as it is, so this new requirement will actually mean *less*
time spent in e-mail, as I'd have to leave the list. Go for it!
You see, I'm reading with elm (on-line) or Eudora (off-line). And not
always both. It depends on what I'm doing.
(Standard request: Please don't send me advice on how _you_ are happy
with Slackware Linux v.3.845 running pine 3.4 on your Pinto-um box. Or
how you run PGP on your campus machines. Etc. I'm happy that you're
happy, which ought to be enough.)
I have little means of solving the Netcom-Macintosh-elm-Eudora issues,
and I don't see others solving them especially cleanly or usably, so I
expect that the "sign your messages or else" dictum would have a
predictable result, for me.
And isn't it up to the _readers_ to decide if they don't want to read
my messages because they think I'm not being diligent enought, or
because my messages appear to be forged?
Isn't end-user choice the core of the Cypherpunk ethos?
"You can't be an anarchist....your messages aren't formatted
according to the rules."
Can we get back to reality?
--Tim May
--
..........................................................................
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments.
Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.
Cypherpunks list: majordomo@toad.com with body message of only:
subscribe cypherpunks. FAQ available at ftp.netcom.com in pub/tcmay
Return to December 1994
Return to “werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)”