1994-11-17 - Re: Changes to remailer@jpunix.com

Header Data

From: “John A. Perry” <perry@jpunix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5039de9591b1daa073ad852e183dbbc5ee1b513774c220669fe1cc6f59bf0f06
Message ID: <199411172235.QAA19976@jpunix.com>
Reply To: <199411171606.AA18990@xtropia>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-17 22:36:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Nov 94 14:36:31 PST

Raw message

From: "John A. Perry" <perry@jpunix.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 94 14:36:31 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Changes to remailer@jpunix.com
In-Reply-To: <199411171606.AA18990@xtropia>
Message-ID: <199411172235.QAA19976@jpunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


#<text/x-pgp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In message <199411171606.AA18990@xtropia> you write:

>here are some other ideas to consider in addition to or instead of the
>20k limit:
> * require encryption for incoming messages.

Good idea in theory but won't work in practice. The stats generated by the
anonymous remailer show that less than 40% of the messages passing thru
are encrypted. Most people would find being forced to encrypt a huge
inconvenience. BTW everyone, when I say stats, I mean the primitive stats
generated by the remailer and are available to anyone sending email to
remailer@jpunix.com with the subject being remailer-stats. Don't start
asking me if I get these stats by logging! I don't log. 

> * require that the sender, the receiver, or both be a known remailer
>   address.  at least one other remailer has to be involved.

You are talking about fortress remailers. This is currently under 
discussion. Stay tuned.

> * impose a 20k limit on message unless they are received from a known
>   remailer and sent to a known remailer.

Good in theory once again, but bad in practice. This would entice the
abusers to jeopardize several remailers instead of just one. Every
remailer that spam/proprietary-stuff goes through would be potentially at
risk also. If remailers are going to be legally jeopardized, I would 
think the impact would be less if it were one instead of many. But, there 
is also safety in numbers. Hmm...

 John A. Perry - KG5RG - perry@jpunix.com
 WWW - http://jpunix.com
 PGP 2.62 key for perry@jpunix.com is on the keyservers.
 PGP-encrypted e-mail welcome!
 
 Finger kserver@jpunix.com for PGP keyserver help.
 Finger remailer@jpunix.com for remailer help.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Finger kserver@jpunix.com for PGP keyserver help.

iQCVAwUBLsvawFOTpEThrthvAQGQQgP/RMC1DZXKPfGQzQd+3TQv8czp9AGRvuAq
8sTiJ+vt8XLrSumZ+2UUHSv/wJovA5pq64lC0U4EtrZY9t6rexnSmgDrBnLyn5VJ
wZ/bi+0GQa7xxfcxJWgqf372n/RjNT3Kbpg6XhNF1dQtwpq3VMkKbHqfsvwDdR2h
65kzLPGd5VA=
=P/Bk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
#





Thread