1994-11-19 - Re: usenet-to-mail

Header Data

From: adam.philipp@ties.org (Adam Philipp)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 77f95c8899c4605538caa5564cd0e99bf5100ff865a8a3afac4fb9045fd0e54f
Message ID: <m0r8x3T-0005TlC@powergrid.electriciti.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-19 21:11:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Nov 94 13:11:13 PST

Raw message

From: adam.philipp@ties.org (Adam Philipp)
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 94 13:11:13 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: usenet-to-mail
Message-ID: <m0r8x3T-0005TlC@powergrid.electriciti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>"Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu> wrote:
>>More importantly, are there are usenet-to-mail gateways?
>
>Would there by any benefit to doing this at all over the present system?
>Why would someone submit a message to the remailer "bramble" via newsgroup
>instead of just mailing it?  Unless you find an anonymous way to post to
>the newsgroup in the first place, your security seems to be seriously
>compromised. Even if everything is encrypted, you've made traffic analysis
>a huge amount easier.  And if you are finding a way to post the a newsgroup
>anonymously in the first place, odds are you have some other entry point to
>the remailer bramble, so why make a stop on the newsgroup opening yourself
>up to traffic analysis?
>
>Now that I think about it, it seems that there isn't really any reason for
>such a thing.
>
Also one very bad reason NOT to do this. Posting to a newsgroup would remove
any ECPA protection that your e-mail may have had. Sure, it isn't much, but
at least proven interception could discourage traffic analysis. Proving it
is left as an exercise for the student.

     Adam

--
PGP Key available on the keyservers. Encrypted E-mail welcome.

Sub rosa: Confidential, secret, not for publication. 
             -Black's Law Dictionary






Thread