From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 04:37:02 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: White Knight Remailers
In-Reply-To: <199411230816.DAA00313@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Message-ID: <199411231239.HAA18665@hermes.bwh.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


| Adam Shostack writes:
| [oddly, I never received the original copy of this; I seem to be missing
| list messages with increasing frequency recently :(  ]
| > Real remailers (with return address features) should probably
| > be advertised in alt.support.* and alt.recovery, in order to build a
| > class of "good" users for them. [...]

When I wrote this, I did not mean to claim that remailers w/o return
addresses are not real.  I meant to say that remailers that rely on
operator screning & approval of messages are not what I consider real
remailers.

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
						       -Hume