1994-11-29 - Re: We really aren’t paranoid :)

Header Data

From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
To: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@netcom.com>
Message Hash: a901366705c54409e9304628eda86fe2a335239636c726a97c12fd2c9801f9ae
Message ID: <Pine.3.07.9411291411.G4081-9100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
Reply To: <Chameleon.4.00.941128201052.jcorgan@.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-29 19:03:53 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Nov 94 11:03:53 PST

Raw message

From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 94 11:03:53 PST
To: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: We really _aren't_ paranoid :)
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.4.00.941128201052.jcorgan@.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9411291411.G4081-9100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 28 Nov 1994, Johnathan Corgan wrote:
[snip]

>   Ginsburg later asked Days to cite an example of a law which Congress
>   would NOT have the authority to enact under the Interstate Commerce
>   Clause.  Interjected Justice Scalia, "Don't give away anything here.
>   They might want to do it."

I'm not sure I follow.  Is Scalia saying, "Don't give away anything here. 
They[Congress?] might want to do it."?

Thanks

Ben.








Thread