From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aefb2cd56343cdb07cf24b1b40744222ee4794a75565654e6d5f3fea686a4a89
Message ID: <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199411301638.PAA05151@seabsd.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-30 23:21:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 15:21:04 PST
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 15:21:04 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?
In-Reply-To: <199411301638.PAA05151@seabsd.hks.net>
Message-ID: <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@hks.net>
Does the idea of having the list software check signatures strike
anybody else as a Bad Idea?
You mean, like the proposer (me)?
I think it _would_ be a bad idea to have the server check all
signatures, and I said so last night. That's why I only plan on doing
syntactic checks.
Steve Witham understands this. Steve, didn't you used to fake all of
your sigs, from the last time this got discussed?
Eric
Return to December 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”