1994-11-30 - Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aefb2cd56343cdb07cf24b1b40744222ee4794a75565654e6d5f3fea686a4a89
Message ID: <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199411301638.PAA05151@seabsd.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-30 23:21:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 15:21:04 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 15:21:04 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Authentication at toad.com: WTF?
In-Reply-To: <199411301638.PAA05151@seabsd.hks.net>
Message-ID: <199412010019.QAA11912@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: "L. Todd Masco" <cactus@hks.net>

   Does the idea of having the list software check signatures strike
   anybody else as a Bad Idea?  

You mean, like the proposer (me)?

I think it _would_ be a bad idea to have the server check all
signatures, and I said so last night.  That's why I only plan on doing
syntactic checks.

Steve Witham understands this.  Steve, didn't you used to fake all of
your sigs, from the last time this got discussed?

Eric





Thread