1994-11-30 - Re: Premail and transparent email

Header Data

From: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
To: raph@netcom.com (Raph Levien)
Message Hash: dd5c2d1c905a6b2fae5cdd6d2ed818be58c76cf223289994292be4bbae503c25
Message ID: <199411301904.LAA28160@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199411300033.QAA23322@netcom15.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-30 19:04:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 11:04:08 PST

Raw message

From: jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 11:04:08 PST
To: raph@netcom.com (Raph Levien)
Subject: Re: Premail and transparent email
In-Reply-To: <199411300033.QAA23322@netcom15.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199411301904.LAA28160@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Raph Levien writes
> My intent is to get large numbers of people to use PGP to encrypt all
> of their email, including casual stuff. This won't happen until
> encryption and decryption are _totally_ transparent.


This is the way to get people to use crypto.

It would also be useful to patch majordomo to check signature
consistency -- to check that a message signed by X is signed
with the same public key as previous messages by X (a non
trivial problem because of the key distribution issue).

In the absence of such tools, nagging people to use crypto
is unlikely to do much to further the cause.


-- 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our
property, because of the kind of animals that we        James A. Donald
are.  True law derives from this right, not from
the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.            jamesd@acm.org





Thread