1994-11-18 - Re: working group draft announcements

Header Data

From: “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: de49b085f80ecfacc22b5c5551c2fd9065c0415a2edb6dfd2a7da6e86e1b2463
Message ID: <199411182332.SAA28162@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <199411182152.QAA08885@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-18 23:32:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 18 Nov 94 15:32:17 PST

Raw message

From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 94 15:32:17 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: working group draft announcements
In-Reply-To: <199411182152.QAA08885@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu>
Message-ID: <199411182332.SAA28162@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Bob Snyder writes:
> How would a note about the drafts being pending and the posting of the
> announcement be significantly different?  I appreciate the MIME
> encoding of the mail, since my MIME mail reader can go out and pull
> them for me.

Speaking of which, can anyone explain why my usually-MIME-compliant mail
reader (ELM 2.4 PL22) pukes on the fancy parts of all these draft
announcements ?  Personally, I find MIMEd messages very annoying because I'm
forced to hit RETURN (not just "any key") several extra times for each
message.  {Luckily, it's clear that I'd never have time to read any of these,
so they get tossed in the bit bucket almost immediately.}

- -L. McCarthy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1

iQCVAwUBLs05aWf7YYibNzjpAQGFKgP7BoFckFIIQ7GzoPiqExUWesbVHi0r4zjp
yD/d2ipLQA6ii8VDMviJ6Y2j3wyxk5gNDYBgkHG56D57gD0SwJL8tlCUgvQDkprM
AsCiu4ojNDVAdt+jppITPimMIUM5gRRh7uuMcjzunI6PDl3056H+ZGQXJAJV9g21
34UaRN4mSfQ=
=jH2A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Thread